87 million recovered they say. mine isnt in there

[ValDes]

for me is simpler. i put 50 euro, play small, take it out. if comes back normal time then ok maybe
no review site tell you this. only your own money tell you the truth about a casino

 

[bill_collins]

A £50 test proves the site can pay £50. It tells you nothing about £5,000, because the thresholds that trigger enhanced verification sit well above test amounts. That's not an argument against doing it. It's an argument against concluding much from it passing.

 

[ValDes]

is still more than reading a number out of ten from somebody paid to write it

 

[Greenpickle]

both of you are right which is the annoying bit

 

[FrozenAcc]

filed it this morning. put the chat logs in, the deposit ids, dates of every contact
parent company turns out to run four other brands i already had accounts with. didn't know that an hour ago

 

[vogafox]

and there's the actual lesson, arriving 44 posts in from the bloke who started it
cross three sources, look for bad news surviving on the page, check the parent not the brand, treat anything under a year old as untested. that's it. there isn't a fifth thing

 

[coinwaste]

still say the counter is marketing. 87 million came back, nobody publishes what didn't and nobody ever will because nobody's counting it. hope yours lands though mate. genuinely

 

[PirateG]

87 million is still 87 million more than the people slagging it off have got back for anyone