played sweet bonanza pop last night and im more confused than before

Greenpickle

Greenpickle

Active member
Messages
167
Reaction score
177
Points
43
Location
Taos, NM
said last week id put a hundred through it when it landed so thats done, about 400 spins on it last night
the game is fine. that's the honest answer. hits constantly, the multipliers do all the work, and the three pop jackpots have actual names now which i didn't expect - spark is 50x, snap is 500x, burst is the 25,000x. same ladder as gates pop to the pound

but here's what i've been chewing on since. gates of olympus pop came out august 31st. gates of olympus 2500 came out september 28th. four weeks apart, same franchise, and they're nothing like each other. pop is 3x5, medium, no buy button at all. 2500 is 6x5, high volatility, multipliers up to 2,500x, and it has four different buy options and six special bet tiers

both capped at 25,000x max win. so its not one game reskinned seven times like i was saying last week. its the same name built for two completely different people in the same month
 
well that two gates releases is the right thing to be looking at and it kills the conveyor argument stone dead
GATES OF OLYMPUS 2500 runs 96.52 rtp, high volatility, ante bets at 25x 55x and 110x on top of the 20x normal, super spins at 400x and 5,000x, and buys at 100x 250x 500x and 1,250x. that is a game built for somebody who wants to spend 1,250x to skip the base game
gates of olympus pop runs 97.05, medium, and has no buy and no ante. higher return, no way to accelerate, three rows
same ip, half a percent apart, four weeks apart and they've aimed them at opposite ends of a room.
 
agreed on all that and i still cant explain the rtp ladders, which was my question last week and nobody got near it
gates pop under the top config: 96.56, 95.56, 94.57. sweet bonanza pop: 96.58, 95.59, 94.56. a hundredth of a percent apart on two of them and a hundredth the other way on the third. if they're really running different maths how do the lower versions land that close
 
I've spent another week on it. ladders that close usually mean a shared certification target rather than a shared build - you aim each config at a band and let the symbol weights land where they need to. but that's me reasoning from how I would do it, not from anything Pragmatic has published, and I want to be clear about which of those I'm doing.
what I can tell you is the thing nobody can tell you. yhere is no public statement anywhere about what sits underneath the POP titles. every writeup says the same four words - accessible, casual, streamlined, approachable. not one says engine.
 
No, and the difference matters for what @Greenpickle is describing.
An ante bet raises your stake per spin and improves your odds of triggering the feature naturally. On Gates 2500 the normal bet costs 20x and the ante tiers cost 25x, 55x and 110x. You are still spinning. A buy skips the base game entirely. You pay 100x, 250x, 500x or 1,250x and you are in the feature immediately.
Both are absent from the POP titles. Neither exists on Sweet Bonanza POP or Gates POP in any build I can find.

Separate matter that keeps getting mixed in here, so while I'm typing:
  • The 97.05% is the top configuration. It is not necessarily what you loaded.
  • Pragmatic ship several RTP versions of each title. The operator picks one at integration. The RNG stays provider side.
On Gates POP that spread runs 97.05 down to 94.57. Nearly two and a half percent, and the game looks identical at either end.
 
The game's info panel should state the RTP for the build you have open, so start there. Past that you are comparing against the provider demo and trusting the operator.

Not a satisfying answer. It is the answer.
 
right, buy thing i've had a proper look this morning because i said i would and there's something in here that nobody in this thread has mentioned and it changed how i read the whole POP idea. uk build of sweet bonanza pop is 10p to £5 a spin. that's it. that's the ceiling
mine isn't. the listings outside the uk run to 250 a spin and gates 2500 goes to 240 with all six ante tiers and all four buys live. so when you lot talk about "the game" you're not all talking about the same product. a bloke in manchester and me are looking at two different things with the same name on them
, cheers
 
@x@nter has put his finger on something more important than the reskin question, so let me fill in why the UK build looks like that.

Feature buys have been prohibited for UK-licensed operators since 31 October 2021. Studios stripped them out of UK builds and the same title ships with them intact elsewhere, which is why this exact confusion comes round roughly monthly. Autoplay went in the same period. Minimum spin speed is 2.5 seconds. And online slot stakes have been capped at £2 a spin for 18 to 24s and £5 a spin for everyone else since September 2024.

Now look at POP against that list. Three rows, lands roughly one spin in three, no buy button, reads instantly on a phone, and a top stake it cannot exceed here anyway. That is not a lazy game. That is a game designed for the rules it has to live under.

Gates 2500, with its 1,250x buy and its 110x ante, is designed for a market that isn't this one.
 
That framing is going to annoy me all afternoon so I'll deal with it now. The UK build has the higher RTP. 97.05 against 96.52 on the one you're calling the grown-up version. You are describing the better-returning product as the kids version because it won't let you pay 1,250x to skip to the bonus. I've recorded both. Gates 2500 with the buys is more fun, I'm not going to pretend otherwise, and the buy options are exactly why it's more fun. But "fun" and "they've taken something from me" are not the same complaint and you've merged them.
 
i don't care about the 0.5% when the version i want is sat behind a border mate. you can have the better maths
 
uk gambling in 2026 is a man in a hi vis watching you play a 3 row slot for 20p. enjoy the rtp lads
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top