Indonesia players how are you managing now?? DANA blocked, 28k bank accounts frozen, 2.4m sites down

O

Obim34

New member
Messages
14
Reaction score
14
Points
3
hi all. want to ask serious question for Indonesian players - maybe you all see news. ministry of communication block 2.45 million gambling websites in only 2 weeks last month. PPATK freeze 28000 bank accounts. even DANA start to block gambling transactions automatically.

i have been play online for maybe 3 years. always use dana for deposit and withdraw. last week dana reject my deposit to BK8. got notification from DANA that transaction "tidak dapat diproses". first time this happen.
so what all indonesian players doing now? is still possible to play safely or better stop completely? any site still working for ID players?
 
yes same issue with local ewallet now. happen to me with OVO last month also. they doing automated detection on transaction patterns. if you deposit small amounts to same merchant repeatedly it flags eventually. Indonesia situation different from 1 year ago for sure
what site were you on? some still werk via direct bank transfer but slower
 
BK8. always good for me before. maybe 1 year i play there. the bk8 itself still accessible with vpn, no problem. but payment method is the problem now. the bank transfer option also now showing delay for some local banks. BRI seems still ok for me but scared to use too much from same account
 
crypto is literally the only answer for indo players at this point. usdt on binance, deposit to casino. bank sees nothing. dana sees nothing. ppatk sees nothing. its 2025 bro this problem is solved already
 
Timmy said:
crypto is literally the only answer for indo players at this point. usdt on binance, deposit to casino. bank sees nothing. dana sees nothing. ppatk sees nothing. its 2025 bro this problem is solved already
Click to expand...
yo're right that crypto routes around the payment blocking. still but worth being clear about what you're actually doing here. Indonesian law prohibits gambling. using crypto to route around financial monitoring doesn't make the gambling legal - it makes it less detectable. Those are two different things. so arrests this year have been mostly operators and syndicates, not individual players. sadly "mostly not players" is different from "never players"
 
yes i get its illegal here. not looking for lecture sorry. looking for practical information about what people are doing. so ik the risk

about crypto - how do indonesian folks buy USDT easily? binance require KYC and connect to local bank which defeats the purpose right? or maybe tokocrypto?
 
tokocrypto is indonesian exchange, also needs kyc and bank verification. for peer to peer buying crypto with local method is possible without connecting main bank account. ovo to crypto via p2p market sometimes work. the point is to create one step between your bank and the casino. direct bank to casino = flag. bank to crypto exchange to casino = harder to detect but not impossible if ppatk is motivated
honestly the safest method right now is USDT direct deposit. BK8 supports it. we88 also. withdrawal back to USDT, then p2p sell to local. extra steps but works
 
worth noting what the government said their two targets are: effective site blocking technology and vpn regulation. they don't have vpn regulations yet. that's still in consultation. but the fact they're explicitly targeting vpns means the window of accessibility via vpn is finite.
anyway not saying it closes tomorrow more like direction of travel is clear.
 
vpn crackdown timeline matters. they've been drafting it since august. consultations with academics and tech experts. kemenko polkam leading the effort. the stated model is somewhere between china-style total ban and targeted blocking of vpn providers known to be used for gambling access. full vpn ban is technically complex and politically difficult in indonesia because vpn use for legitimate business is widespread. targeted blocking of specific vpn providers is more feasible and probably what they implement. the sites themselves stay blocked but the workaround method gets harder to use reliably. 2026 is when this probably gets uncomfortable.
 
two cents from outside indonesia but relevant. been in situations in other restricted markets. account freeze risk is the one people underestimate. ppatk identified 23,000+ bank accounts in just the october-november blocking period. those aren't just operator accounts
so pattern detection is getting smarter. they look for repeated small deposits to flagged merchant categories,P2P transfers that match casino timing, accounts that receive round-number credits then immediately withdraw
like even if ur specific account hasn't been tuoched yet, the monitoring infrastructure now exists in a way it didn't two years ago
 
ok let's summarize all i understoon from it:

- dana and ovo becoming unreliable for direct deposit​
- direct bank transfer still works for some banks but risky for same account repeat use​
- crypto (USDT) via p2p most reliable but requires extra setup​
- vpn crackdown coming probably 2026​
- bank account freeze is real risk even for players, not just operators​
- 259 arrests this year mostly operators​
 
oh btw @coinwaste how do they identify account as gambling related? if i use p2p to buy USDT and than deposit to BK8 does my bank even see casino name actually?!
 
your bank sees the p2p counterparty not the casino. thats the protection. the risk is if your p2p counterparty is already flagged by ppatk then the transaction chain traces back to you. also if you're buying and selling crypto frequently in small amounts it can still trigger AML review at the exchange level even if not the bank. nothing is zero risk in this environment.
id call it just different risk profiles..
 
The official numbers provide useful context. Between 2017 and June 2025, Rp 976.8 trillion flowed through gambling platforms across 709 million transactions. Despite this the arrest rate for individual players is low. The enforcement is concentrated on operators and syndicates for obvious resource reasons. However the PPATK's stated model is evolving toward predictive rather than reactive monitoring.

The DANA case is instructive: they reported an 80% reduction in gambling-linked transactions after implementing automated detection. That reduction came from the payment method becoming unreliable, not from enforcement. The practical pressure on players is mostly operational rather than legal right now, but both vectors are getting worse simultaneously.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top