Search results

pop launched as a brand inside pragmatic in july and took fat pandas place. that's the whole connection, its not the same output continuing under a new name

3 pop titles isn't the number that matters anyway, franchise count is sweet bonanza got super scatter in july last year, pop yesterday, and there's a sweet bonanza xmas 2500 booked for dec 3rd. gates got pop on aug 31st and 2500 on sept 28th. that's one franchise getting two releases in four...

i bet my hat on that nobody does that by accident or copy paste

well that two gates releases is the right thing to be looking at and it kills the conveyor argument stone dead GATES OF OLYMPUS 2500 runs 96.52 rtp, high volatility, ante bets at 25x 55x and 110x on top of the 20x normal, super spins at 400x and 5,000x, and buys at 100x 250x 500x and 1,250x...

well shops went the same way years before the casinos did

machines number in that statement is the one nobody has picked up. gaming machines revenue up 14% in the quarter, tables up 3, electronic gaming up 5. 14 against 3. the floors are turning into machine sheds with a roulette table in the corner for decoration, and that's been happening for years...

the button existed and on a lot of sites it didn't do what it said. that's not a naming argument that's a functioning argument. better ask @sufferinsilence how much his existing button saved him tho

check it rather than assume. the requirement is that gross limits are offered to everyone and reintroduced where they'd been removed, and that they're shown with at least equal prominence to any other limit what i don't know is whether an existing net limit gets converted, relabelled or left...

before anything. its the total you pay in over the period, full stop say your limit is 200 a month. you deposit 200, you win, you withdraw 500. under a gross limit you've used your whole allowance and you cant deposit again until it resets. under a net limit that withdrawal wipes out your...

frankly speaking quite opposite... bonus spend is the first thing cut when margin tightens because its the only cost they can switch off overnight what you get instead is more cashback and more loyalty points. cheaper for them, feels like something, doesn't need a big headline

crypto casinos run the exact same bonus mechanics. thats where the 450% at 40x in the OP came from

thats a sticky bonus and its the worst product in the industry.. you see non-sticky, your deposit stays yours and you can withdraw whenever you like. sticky, the two are welded together until wagering clears. same word on the button for both @sufferinsilence for what its worth thats not you...

thats basically right and worth putting numbers on. 100 in, 450 bonus, 550 to turn over at 40x is 22,000 of wagering. on a 96% slot the house expects to keep about 880 of that over the long run. your bonus was 450 they're not selling you 450 quid. they're selling you the feeling of it and buying...

bit that gets me is the sheer volume. a quarter of everything going into the commission's contact center is this one issue that's not a handful of operators being sloppy. that's the standard way the industry has decided to do it

fair, that's a proper distinction and i skipped over it the software behavior is what i'd still flag though. real time enforcement of a max bet is trivial to build. every operator that doesn't build it has made a choice about that

the point is you can now finish. thats not nothing. before january the maths on a 40x meant most people never got near the end. but the max bet clause is the one that worries me far more than the cashout cap, and it's worth knowing why. the cap costs you money you never had. a max bet breach...

two smaller operators have pulled out of the uk entirely already, lottomatrix and small screen casinos. that's the part that concerns me more than the pricing. fewer licence holders means less competition, less competition means nobody has to compete on RTP or terms. tax squeezes the margin and...

@Scott1baird your instinct is probably right and roulette is actually the wrong game to spot it on, the maths there is fixed by the wheel. slots is where they have actual room to move. numbers are worse than people realise. a slot at 95% costs you 5p on every pound you put through it. drop that...

Fair enough, I'll leave it as disputed then rather than repeat a number i cant stand behind. Thing that should actually worry people on that game isn't the max win anyway, its the RTP versions. default is around 96.2 but there are lower builds in circulation at 94.2, 91.2, 87.2 and 84.2. eighty...

@paul7388 where are you getting 60,000x, I've seen it listed at 40,000x. that's not a rounding difference that's a completely different game