pragmatic play RTP manipulation evidence?

royalFlush87

New member
Messages
2
Reaction score
3
Points
3
there's been a lot of talk recently about Pragmatic polay games having their rtp altered based on player behavior or casino preferences. I've been keeping detailed records of my sessions (over 50,000 spins across various pragmatic titles) and I'm seeing some concerning patterns:
  1. First-time deposits at new casinos seem to have significantly higher win rates on pragmatic games (honeymoon period?)
  2. After hitting a significant win (200x+), the games seem to enter an extended cold period
  3. The same game at different casinos appears to perform very differently in terms of hit frequency
has anyone else documented similar experiences with actual data tracking? I know anecdotal evidence isn't worth much, and variance exists, but these patterns seem too consistent to be random. I'm particularly interested in hearing from anyone with industry knowledge about whether pragmatic offers different RTP versions of their games to operators
 
there's been a lot of talk recently about Pragmatic polay games having their rtp altered based on player behavior or casino preferences. I've been keeping detailed records of my sessions (over 50,000 spins across various pragmatic titles) and I'm seeing some concerning patterns:
  1. First-time deposits at new casinos seem to have significantly higher win rates on pragmatic games (honeymoon period?)
  2. After hitting a significant win (200x+), the games seem to enter an extended cold period
  3. The same game at different casinos appears to perform very differently in terms of hit frequency
has anyone else documented similar experiences with actual data tracking? I know anecdotal evidence isn't worth much, and variance exists, but these patterns seem too consistent to be random. I'm particularly interested in hearing from anyone with industry knowledge about whether pragmatic offers different RTP versions of their games to operators
I can confirm that Pragmatic does offer multiple RTP versions of most games to operators. This isn't unusual - NetEnt, Play'n GO, and most major providers do the same.

What Pragmatic provides are typically:
- Standard version (96.5% RTP typical)
- Medium RTP version (94.5% RTP typical)
- Low RTP version (92% RTP typical)
The casino chooses which version to implement. What they CANNOT do is dynamically change the RTP for individual players or based on deposit patterns - that would violate their licensing conditions with every major regulator

What you're experiencing is likely a combination of:
1. Different casinos using different RTP versions
2. Normal variance (50k spins isn't nearly enough to normalize volatility)
3. Confirmation bias (remembering the patterns that fit your theory)
I'd be very interested to see your actual data though, as detailed player tracking can sometimes reveal issues we should investigate.
 
Thanks for the insider perspective! That makes sense about the different RTP versions. Is there any regulation that requires casinos to disclose which version they're using? Seems like that should be transparent to players.
I'd be happy to share my tracked data privately if you're interested in analyzing it. Mainly focused on Gates of Olympus, Sweet Bonanza, and Wild West Gold as they're my most-played titles.
 
evolution is not better - been playing live blackjack there and having loads of issues lately. cards not displaying properly, dealer audio cutting out, connection drops mid-hand. worst part is when connection drops during a winning hand and you come back to see you "lost" somehow. happened 3 times this week alone. evolution basically runs every live casino so theres no escaping their shitty servers. anyone else having similar shite?
 
evolution is not better - been playing live blackjack there and having loads of issues lately. cards not displaying properly, dealer audio cutting out, connection drops mid-hand. worst part is when connection drops during a winning hand and you come back to see you "lost" somehow. happened 3 times this week alone. evolution basically runs every live casino so theres no escaping their shitty servers. anyone else having similar shite?
yep same issues here mostly on their speed blackjack tables. seems like they're overloaded with players and servers cant handle it
tried raising it with support at different casinos but they all blame "your internet connection" even when everything else works fine :confused:
 
yep same issues here mostly on their speed blackjack tables. seems like they're overloaded with players and servers cant handle it
tried raising it with support at different casinos but they all blame "your internet connection" even when everything else works fine :confused:
exactly same shit every time!! "please check your internet connection" like we're all idiots
evolution makes millions from licensing fees but cant invest in proper server infrastructure? taking the piss
 
speed baccarat has been terrible too connection drops right when you have big bet down then magically reconnects after hand is over with your money gone. their "investigation" process is a joke. they review for 24 hours then claim everything was normal and refuse refunds
 
Seems like Evolution's infrastructure can't handle peak traffic while they keep adding new tables and games instead of fixing existing problems. The "malfunction voids all pays and plays" clause in their terms basically makes them immune to compensation claims even when the fault is clearly on their end.
Best advice is to gather all evidence screenshots, timestamps, chat logs. Most casinos will eventually compensate if you have enough evidence and make enough noise.
 
Seems like Evolution's infrastructure can't handle peak traffic while they keep adding new tables and games instead of fixing existing problems. The "malfunction voids all pays and plays" clause in their terms basically makes them immune to compensation claims even when the fault is clearly on their end.
Best advice is to gather all evidence screenshots, timestamps, chat logs. Most casinos will eventually compensate if you have enough evidence and make enough noise.
basically impossible to get money back once evolution says the hand played normally mate
 
If connection issues occur during active gameplay, the system should default to player protection rather than house protection.
What shocks me the UKGC and MGA have been surprisingly tolerant of these ongoing issues. Live dealer malfunctions should be treated as seriously as slot machine errors, with similar consumer protection requirements.
 
If connection issues occur during active gameplay, the system should default to player protection rather than house protection.
What shocks me the UKGC and MGA have been surprisingly tolerant of these ongoing issues. Live dealer malfunctions should be treated as seriously as slot machine errors, with similar consumer protection requirements.
rahter frustratin 😤
 
Back
Top