Search results

  1. rngismine

    crazy time is NOT rndom damn i even have 3 months of data

    ok i get it will update when make much more spins and will post results then..
  2. rngismine

    crazy time is NOT rndom damn i even have 3 months of data

    one win doesnt disprove 847 documented spins mate
  3. rngismine

    crazy time is NOT rndom damn i even have 3 months of data

    and the ratings agencies were independent certified bodies too...
  4. rngismine

    crazy time is NOT rndom damn i even have 3 months of data

    im not anymore. i stopped playing when i started tracking
  5. rngismine

    crazy time is NOT rndom damn i even have 3 months of data

    thet variance argument doesn't actually address directional bias. sufferinsilences situation is about losing which is different. mine is specifically about WHERE the flapper lands relative to my position. that specificity is what makes this a separate claim
  6. rngismine

    crazy time is NOT rndom damn i even have 3 months of data

    tracked stake distribution too. not skewed toward a single segment. the pattern appears specifically when aggregate bet concentration on one segment exceeds roughly 40% of total table money. not just my bet. the whole table
  7. rngismine

    crazy time is NOT rndom damn i even have 3 months of data

    not variance when its 847 spins with a consistent directional pattern mate
  8. rngismine

    crazy time is NOT rndom damn i even have 3 months of data

    right so i know how this looks. another sore loser blaming the game. but i've actually put in work here been gatering every crazy time spin since jan. 847 spins recorded. noticed early on that when i have a bet concentrated on 5x or 10x the flapper lands one or two positions off. not randomly...
Back
Top