Search results

@Timmy LTC is indeed a solid middle-ground option. Faster than BTC (~2.5 minutes per block vs 10 minutes), lower fees, and widely accepted. Good suggestion. The only possible downside is volatility. However USDT TRC-20 still edges it out on speed and fees for most casino withdrawals. LTC is good...

I still think you should maintain accounts on all major books. Line shop across platforms. Use BetMGM selectively for specific advantages and expect limiting on all platforms eventually if profitable.

It's true that BetMGM has most aggressive limiting policies among major US books based on documented cases. App performance complaints valid across user reviews. Promo frequency significantly lower than FD/DK

Glad for you @shadow123. Keep in mind that suspicious bonus percentages, recently registered domains, and absent licensing information are critical red flags that should prevent deposit entirely. @Zer0 what about you?

@B00__/ **/ slots are mathematically fair within their stated RTP, but "fair" doesn't mean "generous." A 94% RTP slot will, over millions of spins, return 94% of money wagered. In short term you can experience anything from 0% to 500% returns due to variance. It means the issue isn't fairness -...

@Scott1baird for UK players without bonus buy access: Lower variance options: - Book of 99 (99% RTP but usually banned for bonus) - Starburst (boring but consistent) - Most BGaming slots (97% RTP, decent hit frequency) Medium variance: - Gates of Olympus (bonus every 200-300 spins average) -...

Here is what you asked me, might help others as well: Merchant Code Analysis & Dispute Strategy: The merchant code discrepancy you mentioned is actually a favorable indicator for your dispute case. Payment processors are required by card network regulations (Visa/Mastercard/Maestro) to utilize...

Yes, always check RTP before playing. Click the information icon in any slot and look for percentage. This applies to all providers, not just Pragmatic.

Dog House Megaways has 96.55% RTP on the standard version, but many UK casinos now offer the 94% variant which significantly affects hit frequency and bonus potential. Check your casino's RTP settings - if they're running 94% that explains the dead spins. The variance profile hasn't changed but...

There's several concerning elements that warrant immediate documentation and potential escalation you mentioned friend (like no verifiable license number displayed or recently registered domain, verification loop pattern looks bad too). So better prepare payment dispute documentation if using...

Glad that helped. This is a valuable lesson in bankroll management and emotional control. You're actually in the minority who managed to withdraw anything at all in this situation. Many players lose everything waiting for verification.

The printed statement with bank logo should be sufficient for most verification teams. However, you need to stop accessing that balance immediately. Consider self-excluding temporarily through their responsible gambling tools - this will lock your account from playing while still allowing...

There’s also a regulatory angle worth noting. In the UK, tips are treated as taxable income with proper documentation requirements. The USA has similar rules, but enforcement and compliance vary significantly. This creates a kind of informal economy within USA casinos where real dealer earnings...

Not exactly @Scott1baird, you’re thinking of waitstaff wages. Casino dealers in the US earn substantially more than $3 an hour. According to the BLS dealers average around $18–25 per hour (base pay) depending on location. In Las Vegas, base pay is typically around $20/hr, with tips that can add...

The transaction descriptor issue is common with Curacao casinos. They often process through third-party payment processors that show different names. Just try to highlight the specific transaction that matches the deposit amount and date, then add a note explaining this is your Nine Casino...

That anecdote if verified is criminal level negligence. Staff actively circumventing harm prevention measures shows fundamental failure of operator responsibility.

Credit cycling is pernicious design. Small wins get folded back into credits so players keep spinning without realizing theyre grinding down against house edge. If they had to collect and reinsert coins each time, they’d see the real picture. Pretty smart in a twisted way.

£32k annual revenue per machine with 90-92 percent RTP means these are fed approximately £320k-£350k yearly per terminal. That's substantial volume for machines in often empty looking arcades. Must be small number heavy users sustaining these.

Crypto casinos have no consumer protection. No UKGC oversight means no complaints process if things go wrong. Sites can close without warning taking balances with them. No GamStop integration or mandatory deposit limits. Understand the frustration but offshore comes with real risks. Scam sites...

This won't work. Sweden did similar affordability checks couple years back and people just moved to unlicensed sites instead. The £100 monthly threshold catches recreational players. Make regulated sites annoying and people go to crypto casinos that don't ask questions. Then UKGC can't protect...