Search results

displacement numbers are already visible and they're quicker than i expected. one monitoring outfit counted 575 unauthorised sites aimed at brazil on the 26th of september. the day before that it was 311. so 244 new ones appeared inside 24 hours of lula confirming it licensed traffic dropped...

look mate nobody said scam. i said the regulator wrote down that it didn't know who owned it and licensed it anyway you keep hearing the stronger version because you've got money there. that's not a dig, i do it too with sites i'm on

that's the honest limitation and nobody wants to say it. its a photograph of one regulator in one period. it doesn't tell you about malta or anjouan or the isle of man, and it goes stale what it does permanently is change what you can ask for. once players have seen what a regulator holds, "we...

that's true and its not what the reporting says. specific claim is that the operator got a licence in 2025 while the regulator still had unresolved questions about who actually owned it. beneficial ownership unclear, in their own assessment, and they issued anyway that's not "stake appears in a...

don't. that's the correct outcome for most people and its why i said it at the top

went and looked at the irs data on this because i wanted to know how many people are actually in the itemising group. 2023 filings reported just over 50 billion in gambling winnings with 42.7 billion in losses deducted. under a 90% cap that deduction drops to roughly 38.4 billion so about four...

i'm not going to apologise for telling people who aren't affected that they're not affected half this forum was about to spend a weekend terrified over a rule that doesn't reach them. that's worth thirty seconds

that's not a defence of it. its so the guy with forty dollars on the chiefs doesn't spend a week thinking he's been ruined

before everyone panics, this doesn't touch most people in here if you take the standard deduction you never deducted gambling losses in the first place. you report your W2Gs and that's it. the 90% cap changes nothing for you because you were already deducting zero it bites if you itemise, and...

that's the one thing he's said in two threads i actually agree with the curve is real. the sites i tracked that went bad didn't start bad, they started generous. fast payouts, decent support, small delays creeping in around a year, then the excuses start arriving in matching wording across...

ok sure. just don't then tell me the little guy won

well don't enjoy it too much pal because the number doesn't say what you want it to say! read that broke the deposit data down properly. most individual deposits are still under a hundred dollars. the bulk of the volume comes from a thin slice of high balance wallets. and three operators handle...

sure they're in it. tribal gaming authorities have filed alongside states on this and its a bigger deal than the state cases in some ways because exclusivity compacts are the whole basis of tribal gaming revenue and a federally regulated exchange routes straight round them im not going to...

they didn't go to the supreme court though did they. they asked the full ninth circuit to rehear it, which reads to me like they don't fancy their odds at scotus with the record as it stands and they'd rather fix the ninth first

both of you are right which is the annoying bit

i've kept my own sheet on this for about two years, not out of cleverness, out of not being able to tell any other way what predicts trouble isn't the score. its whether complaints share a shape. one guy waiting three weeks is a queue. eleven guys all getting told they're under enhanced review...

yeah. that's not the gotcha you think it is though

I did the same, different game, and I was older than you when I started. roulette sites were the obvious ones but the trading itself was the part that got me. Watching a market, timing a sale, being up or down on the week. By the time i touched an actual casino the emotional machinery was...

could be either honestly. plenty of them are still trading fine, they've just stopped being answerable to anyone. which is sort of the point people keep making and sort of not an emergency

been reading complaint boards on this for a while and the pattern that shows up isn't outright theft, its stalling. verification confirmed, then the withdrawal sits with no timeline. there's one up at the moment where somebody's been waiting eight days on ten grand with verification already done...