mine's the same. no wording either way. that's sort of the point of the change though isn't it, if only one kind can be called a deposit limit then in three weeks the label will actually mean something
yea thats standard now on most sites, been like that a couple of years. they call that crap a liveness check. think it's to stop someone using a stolen document
oh well cashout cap is the first thing i look for now, before the wagering number. learned that the hard way in feb
sorry @sufferinsilence, £612 down to £150 is horrible however legal it is
well is there any chance bingo got better? the 90 ball rooms i play have more sessions on now and the tickets are cheaper than they were in march. everything else has got worse tbh
agreed. uk gets a lot of stick on here and deserves some of it but at least ther'es a system. reading about people losing balances with no recourse because they were never technically customers is grim. that couldn't happen the same way here
oh my! this is the bit that gets me. in the UK if a licensed operator holds your withdrawal wrongly you've got the ombudsman, the ukgc, an actual complaints route. reading this it sounds like US sweeps players have literally nothing because the whole model was built specifically so you're not...
as someone whose bf has had a couple of bad stretches can say the bit that got me wasn't bout seven days. it was that a person looked at that account, saw whatever they saw, and decided no further action necessary. then eighteen grand went in the next day. somebody made that call. someone sat...
i've been thinking about this since @bill_collins put the numbers on it. i play on bet365 partly out of habit and partly because it feels safer - ukgc licensed, dispute resolution if anything goes wrong, gamstop integration. but if the rtp is being quietly compressed toward offshore levels...