had a go on it this morning on my break, maybe three quid. won something nearly every spin and still ended up with less than i started, which i think is the actual design rather than my luck
crypto line in those findings is the one i keep going back to. from what i can make out their process basically needed the crypto to have been turned into pounds through a proper bank account first, and after that it was in. one customer funded that way and it didnt even push him up a risk...
timmy this whole thread is about a company that got fined because nobody in the building noticed a man lose fifty grand. that's the thing you keep calling the old way of doing it. well my bf went through a bad patch on his phone two years ago and not one person saw it. at least in a room there's...
the bit that stays with me is the 800 people. some of them will be ordinary company directors who've done nothing at all and their due diligence file is now on a website anyone can search. thats a real cost even if the reporting is right about everything else
oh that's true and its also a different problem to mine. im not at risk of ending up in a back room in manchester. i wanted a number that meant the number and for two years i didn't have one. tomorrow i do
both things can be worth doing
this one actually matters to me so ill post it even though nobody will care. so recently every uk licensed site has to offer a gross deposit limit to everyone, and put it back if they'd quietly taken it away. and only that kind can be called a deposit limit now
thats the bit thats been doing my...
mine's the same. no wording either way. that's sort of the point of the change though isn't it, if only one kind can be called a deposit limit then in three weeks the label will actually mean something
yea thats standard now on most sites, been like that a couple of years. they call that crap a liveness check. think it's to stop someone using a stolen document