Recent content by Djamil

If they didn't apply they're supposed to stop. Whether a Curacao site actually blocks NZ is another question. Based on my experience they block when payments get squeezed, not when a law says so.

If you are asking whether they have a license - yes, Anjouan. If you are asking whether it helps you in a dispute - realistically no. There's no complaints process like MGA or UKGC have. Based on my experience with offshore sites, you either sort it out with support or you don't sort it out.

If you are asking whether it meant someone checked who owns the casino - after this, no. I used to play JB, they're Curacao too. I never thought the license was the reason they paid me. Track record is what matters, the license just tells you they filled in the forms.

Don't know. The report says temporarily closed and nothing about where the traffic went. I would assume rerouted to other Latin American capacity but that is me guessing, not reading.

And the studio map moved this month, which is what makes this timely rather than theoretical. Evolution's Brazilian studio is temporarily shut, after the regulatory rollback there in early October. Those tables and those dealers are serving nobody right now. In the same quarter they opened a...

That's more honest than most of this forum manages. Though you were right about the live tables and a letter from Michigan doesn't change that.

Yabby banned me outright and based on my experience that follows you. If you get banned from one casino you typically can't get into its sister sites either, so losing one account can quietly lose you four. That's worth more attention than anyone gives it when they're picking a site. Find out...

No one put any blame on you. Just shit happens like site being unlicensed in Michigan doesn't make it a bad site, it makes it an unlicensed site in Michigan. Those are different things and this thread is about to spend walls of posts confusing them. Mbit was unlicensed in Michigan last week too...

Nobody's been talked out of anything. He's said the quick version suits him less than he thought, which is a different thing to the quick version being bad. I'll keep using First Person for the reason I gave and I'd still tell anyone playing a long session to sit at a live table instead. Both of...

Still the practical reason I use it yet is table availability. Live tables fill up. At peak hours on a mid sized site you can sit through three or four rounds waiting for a seat, or get bumped to a table with limits you didn't want. Infinite Blackjack solved some of that with unlimited seats but...

Ppractical question for everyone outside Spain is whether this spreads, and the honest answer is that it already has in pieces. Payment method in your own name is standard in terms and conditions almost everywhere already. It's difficult to answer definitively whether other regulators will make...

Massachusetts, Iowa and Tennessee had it first. Colorado, Maine and Virginia added theirs earlier this year. Maryland and Pennsylvania have had the recommendation put to them and Ohio's commission is still finalising theirs. So it's six with a ban and three more somewhere in the pipeline. Based...

Signup friction, that's it. Two clicks and you're playing instead of photographing a passport before you've decided if you like the place. It's sold as privacy. It isn't privacy. It's a delay in when the paperwork happens.

@pixelboi metaspins holds it properly for me, balance stays denominated in what I put in. That's the main reason I've stayed there, 2 click signup and the payout hits my wallet without a conversation. Check it with a twenty. Deposit, look at what the balance says, withdraw. Takes five minutes...

click the seal. if it doesn't resolve to a live entry with a company name that matches the one in the terms, treat it as unlicensed regardless of what the footer says. then read what the max bet is while a bonus is active, and assume nothing will stop you exceeding it.