Recent content by conker

whole situation is complete mess with no clear good guys or bad guys (except casino obv)

this whole thing is impossible to judge without seeing all three versions of the review and knowing what riverslots actual terms say about betting patterns like: could be OP violated T&C and doesn't realize it could be casino scammed them could be review site protecting casino could be review...

Lots of NetEnt criticism here which mirrors my experience. I remember Starburst, Gonzo's Quest, Dead or Alive were industry standards. And how the mighty have fallen now...

Yepp this is what I meant about lazy development. Blueprint used to be innovative but now it's just reskins. Interesting to see NetEnt appearing multiple times. They really have fallen off.

We all have our favourite providers, but I'm curious about the flip side - which providers do you see and immediately close the game? For me it's NetEnt these days. Used to love them but everything since 2020 feels like a lazy cash grab. Dead spins for days and when you finally get a bonus it...

@Newbie mate please dont spread unverified rumours current confirmed rules: - £5 max spin (25+) - £2 max spin (18-24) - 2.5 second minimum spin time proposed but not confirmed: - £125/month loss triggers financial checks everything else is speculation

Lil reminder that accessing UK casinos from NL might violate their terms depending on how they detect location. Some use IP geolocation, some just check registration address so check the T&C's carefully before depositing

Theres valid points both sides. Of course regulations can be excessive and push people offshore but offshore also has real risks like @vogafox mentioned. Difficult balance between protecting vulnerable people and keeping players in regulated space with actual oversight Crypto casinos dont have...

Industry claim is staff training and database issues. Reality is enforcement costs money and reduces revenue so there's no incentive

Self exclusion enforcement difficult in physical venues without mandatory ID checks. Online much easier to enforce. But yes 7% efficacy rate s terrific

The UKGC's rationale is harm prevention and protecting problem gamblers from financial damage. But there's acknowledgment even within regulatory discussions that this likely pushes casual players to offshore sites. Tension between protecting vulnerable people and keeping players in regulated...

Surely smart choice - dont play these games.

Even if you play carefully, the house edge combined with wagering requirements creates a math trap. You'd need perfect luck just to break even on the cashback itself. Better approach is withdraw the rest or find a casino with better terms if you wanna keep playing. BitStarz is decent but these...

china attitude to gambling is weird though. hate it internally but happy to let macau rake in billions from it probably cos macau generates massive tax revenue that benefits beijing indirectly

feel i need to praise them as they filled niche that most providers abandoned. if you want simple reliable slots without bells and whistles theyre here for you. dont expect them to be what they aren't ok