Recent content by CatMatt

You'll get used too pretty quick. if you struggle get started here is easy stepbystep instruction: 1. Create account on reputable exchange (Coinbase, Kraken, Binance) 2. Complete verification (ironically requires KYC) 3. Buy Bitcoin or other accepted crypto 4. Send to casino wallet address...

Look crypto casinos offer provably fair gaming which fiat casinos cannot provide. Blockchain verification allows players to verify game fairness. This transparency is impossible with traditional RNG systems. To be fair most players don't actually verify so benefit is theoretical anyway :rolleyes:

Check your binance withdrawal history it will say trc20 or erc20 next to the transaction. If you sent erc20 during high traffic it can take an hour or more

Did you use TRC-20 or ERC-20 network? That's usually the issue. Tron network is instant and cheap while ethereum one can take longer during congestion and costs more in fees. Check your transaction hash on the blockchain explorer. If it's confirmed on-chain but not showing in casino, contact...

Did anyone try the christmas big bass? haven't tested yet but if its anything like regular Big Bass its probably dead spins for 300 rounds then one decent bonus 🤡🤡

Grindin fat santa for about 400 spins yesterday and bonus hit 3 times: - first: 14x - second: 47x - third: 6x Seems like multiplier progression is capped lower than similar push gaming slots so wouldn't recommend unless you're just playing for the theme

That's interesting - what's your reasoning on 3.5 over versus PSG -2.5? Both seem to require PSG dominance but over 3.5 could hit even if Metz scores 1-2 goals

I've been looking Liverpool Brighton closely and Liverpool avg 2.1 xG at home, Brighton conceding 1.8 per away game so both teams hitting 11+ shots on target in recent matches over 2.5 at 1.91 makes sense. Liverpool's defense has been shaky - only 2 clean sheets in last 8 and goals in this one...

Ok so heres my actual Sat. plays after thinking about it: Thunder -10.5 (2u) - sharp side, system supports, Spurs defense vulnerable without reliable Wemby Magic +4.5 (1u) - value play, Magic's pace could create variance Parlay: Thunder ML + Under 225.5 (+180) - Thunder's defense suggests low...

It's the same format, they just renamed it to NBA Cup this year. Finals are December 17th in Vegas. Winner gets trophy + $500k per player. Semifinals are Saturday Dec 13th (this Saturday).

Looking at both games: Thunder -10.5: Strong play, but everyone's on it so I'm worried about trap potential. Line movement supports it though (sharp money). Knicks -4.5: This is 50/50 to me. Magic's pace could expose Knicks' transition D. Suggs and Caldwell-Pope are solid perimeter defenders...

@Hextech.40 zone adjustment? Spurs played man-to-man the whole Lakers game. Their defensive scheme was drop coverage with aggressive help, forcing Lakers into contested midrange. Different from zone.

Just pulled up the tape on that Spurs-Lakers game since everyone's talking about it. Stephon Castle: 30/10/6 on 11-18 shooting. Kid was unconscious in the 4th, hit three straight middies over LeBron. But here's the thing - Lakers' switching defense is trash tier. They were giving up clean looks...

yea i guarantee if commonwealth refunds this $800 it goes straight back into a casino. probably the "faster withdrawal" one op asked about. bank should deny these on principle. youre teaching yourself consequences dont apply

Oh it's classic losing gambler logic so when you win its skill and fair play, but when you lose its rigged and illegal. You're not disputing fraud youre trying to get a refund for gambling losses